Archive for May, 2010

The Europe roundup: How Russian gay activists used the Internet to outwit the Police

Monday, May 31st, 2010

On Personal Democracy Forum, Antonella Napolitano writes:

This weekend a Gay Pride march took place in Moscow took place, but it wasn’t a common event. The Moscow LGBT community has been trying to stage a Gay Pride march every year since May 2006 but the permit has always been denied by the City authorities.
On Saturday, a small group of about 30 participants briefly marched in the busy Leningradsky Street, after organisers totally out-witted the police an security services. More of a flashmob than a march, as it lasted just 10 minutes, but still a significant result for the LGBT community. How was it possible?

Thanks to the Internet and its power of spreading information. Wrong information.

Read the whole post here.

Share

No Secrets: Julian Assange’s mission for total transparency.

Monday, May 31st, 2010

Raffi Khatchadourian writes in the New Yorker:

Assange is an international trafficker, of sorts. He and his colleagues collect documents and imagery that governments and other institutions regard as confidential and publish them on a Web site called WikiLeaks.org. Since it went online, three and a half years ago, the site has published an extensive catalogue of secret material, ranging from the Standard Operating Procedures at Camp Delta, in Guantánamo Bay, and the “Climategate” e-mails from the University of East Anglia, in England, to the contents of Sarah Palin’s private Yahoo account. The catalogue is especially remarkable because WikiLeaks is not quite an organization; it is better described as a media insurgency. It has no paid staff, no copiers, no desks, no office. Assange does not even have a home. He travels from country to country, staying with supporters, or friends of friends—as he once put it to me, “I’m living in airports these days.” He is the operation’s prime mover, and it is fair to say that WikiLeaks exists wherever he does. At the same time, hundreds of volunteers from around the world help maintain the Web site’s complicated infrastructure; many participate in small ways, and between three and five people dedicate themselves to it full time. Key members are known only by initials—M, for instance—even deep within WikiLeaks, where communications are conducted by encrypted online chat services. The secretiveness stems from the belief that a populist intelligence operation with virtually no resources, designed to publicize information that powerful institutions do not want public, will have serious adversaries.

Read the whole story here.

Share

Ofcom issues draft 3 strikes code for ISP’s

Monday, May 31st, 2010

On the ISOC-NY Notice Board, Joly writes:

UK regulator Ofcom has issued a consultation paper on the draft Initial Obligations Code, under which the ‘3 strikes’ rules for copyright infringement will be implemented.

This article by Andrew Cormack of UK educational ISP ja.net details some of the problems in the rules.

* Institutions and businesses may be classified as subscribers and thus over-vulnerable, leading to restrictive practices.

* Community services and libraries may be compelled to log proof of id of all users.

Cormack notes that these provisions are in direct conflict with the UK Government’s digital inclusion policies.

Read the post here.

Share

Internet Freedom Under Pressure in Denmark

Monday, May 31st, 2010

On Global Voices Advocacy, Jacob McHangama writes:

On 27 May the Danish Supreme Court upheld a lower court decision which obliges internet service providers (ISPs) to block access to websites that may contain – or link to other sites which contain – material which infringes copyrights (the Pirate Bay in this instance).

The decision has rightly been criticized as a setback for internet freedom in Denmark. The decision attaches undue weight to the interests of copyright holders while ignoring obvious dangers of abuse, restrictions on internet freedom and access to information and the lack of any due process. The decision may lead to the blocking of websites that mainly includes content that does not infringe copyright and thus restrict the free flow of information. Moreover, by forcing ISP’s to police the Internet without due process the decision marks a dangerous precedent that is likely to include other “illegal” or “offensive” material in the future.

Read the whole post here.

Share

Bangladesh ‘blocks Facebook’ over political cartoons

Monday, May 31st, 2010

From the BBC:

Bangladesh has blocked access to Facebook after satirical images of the prophet Muhammad and the country’s leaders were uploaded, say reports.

Read the whole article here.

Share

Another Attack on Anonymity

Sunday, May 30th, 2010

At Blown to Bits, Harry Lewis writes:

Is it really a threat to our national security that people can pay cash for prepaid cell phones? That is the thought behind federal legislation that has been introduced in the Senate by Democrat Chuck Schumer and Republican John Cornyn. To buy a phone you would have to provide identification and the retailer would have to retain the information for 18 months.

Read the whole piece here.

Share

The Web Shatters Focus, Rewires Brains

Sunday, May 30th, 2010

At Wired, Nicholas Carr, previewing his upcoming book, The Shallows, writes:

What kind of brain is the Web giving us? That question will no doubt be the subject of a great deal of research in the years ahead. Already, though, there is much we know or can surmise—and the news is quite disturbing. Dozens of studies by psychologists, neurobiologists, and educators point to the same conclusion: When we go online, we enter an environment that promotes cursory reading, hurried and distracted thinking, and superficial learning. Even as the Internet grants us easy access to vast amounts of information, it is turning us into shallower thinkers, literally changing the structure of our brain.

Read the whole piece here.

Share

The Age of the Mobile Mash-Up

Sunday, May 30th, 2010

At Crunch Gear, Lars Erik Holmquist writes:

The rate of innovation in mobile services is just about to take a quantum leap. We are going from a divergent and messy ecosystem, where every new concept has to be made into a specialized ”app” that works only on a small sub-set of mobile handsets (even the mighty iPhone only has around 3% of the global mobile phone market), to an environment much more like the web. Today, new services can easily be composed out of existing components and run on a common platform – the browser. We are entering an age where the creation of a new mobile service – taking advantage of such features as the user’s location, social network, personal data, and even phone-specific functions such as the camera and accelerometer – can be mashed-up and put on-line just as easily as Web 2.0 services have been for several years already.

Read the whole piece here.

Share

P2PU: Mashing Up the Open Web Recap

Sunday, May 30th, 2010

On his blog, John Britton writes:

As I mentioned in my previous post, my course, Mashing Up the Open Web, was a huge success. Since I started participating in P2PU, I’ve wanted to organize a course.

Share

Facebook, Network Externalities, Regulation

Sunday, May 30th, 2010

On her blog, Technosociology, Zeynep Tufecki writes:

There is a growing debate about whether people should leave Facebook and whether there should be government regulation. I’d like to argue that it is very difficult for most people to leave Facebook three reasons: network externalities, social norms and technical competence. Network externalities, which I discuss below, means that the first to become a standard has an enormous advantage that can make it very hard for competitors. Plus, I believe that users of sites such as Facebook, Google, and even Ebay, Amazon, Craigslist and Wikipedia (a non-profit), have solid  reasons they can make moral, legal and perhaps even regulatory claims on these companies. Such companies exist by the virtue of the work their users have put in without monetary compensation. Also, they deal with often intimate personal information that deserves protection irrespective of claims about ownership.

Read the whole piece here.

Share